Johanns Believes U.S. Farmers Need A Global Perspective

As United States policy makers consider a new Farm Bill next year, the challenge of meeting domestic needs while balancing global concerns will be at the forefront of discussions. Financial sustainability of U.S. cotton growers needs to be addressed, along with the international demand for greater market access and growth of developing cotton-producing countries. According to U.S Agriculture Secretary Mike Johanns, those goals are not mutually exclusive; in fact, they may require looking at the future of cotton markets from the same perspective.

“Without open markets, the future is clouded for an industry that is so dependent on trade,” Johanns said at the Cato Institute’s Center for Trade Policy Studies in Washington, D.C.

Outlining a proposal on U.S. agriculture policy, Johanns said markets would benefit from reducing so-called trade-distorting support and tariffs by opening trade and increasing economic activity. He said the proposed plan in the Doha Round calls for a 53% reduction in all trade-distorting domestic support, which would mean significant changes to the 2002 Farm Bill. That would decrease the current allowed base spending level from $47.9 billion to $22 billion, but Johanns said he didn’t want domestic growers to get the wrong idea. Even with those changes, he emphasized that he supports the U.S. government’s investment in agriculture, but believes that assistance can be re-structured to better serve the global community.

“Our current Farm Bill programs cannot achieve their objectives with these substantial reductions, so these programs would have to be reformed if we reach an agreement that reduces trade-distorting support by 53%. This would cause us to rethink how we support agriculture,” Johanns said. “Viewed another way, we would have the opportunity to shift our resources to green box for example, such as conservation. There is no current ceiling on the green box today.”

A Difference of Opinion

Johanns has traveled the country, talking to farmers at Farm Bill listening sessions to learn what they like and dislike about the current policy. The comments vary across the spectrum from farmers who want substantial changes to those who would like to see the 2002 bill rubber-stamped for another five years. From cotton growers in Lubbock, TX, the answer was almost unanimous. “They want the Farm Bill reauthorized,” Johanns said. Other farmers have concerns about “trade-proofing the program” or “equitable distribution of federal funds to the areas that do not grow program crops.”

Some policies, such as conservation and Rural Development programs, receive few criticisms, while the subsidy programs are a point of contention. To understand the different perspectives, Johanns said it was important to analyze the current bill and examine its effects on U.S. agriculture and trade. Breaking the 2002 Farm Bill down to what he called “just the facts,” Johanns explained why some growers seek what they call a more equitable distribution of government subsidies.

“In the U.S., five crops account for 21% of our cash receipts in agriculture. Those five crops receive 93% of our subsidy payments,” he said. “Meanwhile our specialty crop farms which are now equal in value to the program crops – let me repeat that our specialty crops are equal in value to our program crops – receive virtually nothing from the subsidy program … So we have one group that gets the lion’s share of subsidies and another group equal in production value that receives virtually nothing.”

In addition to the disparities between program and specialty crops, Johanns also explained that subsidies were not allocated equally to the five program crops. He said on average, using numbers from 2002-2005, program crop subsidies were distributed as follows: soybeans received about 6%; rice, 8%; wheat, 10%; cotton, 23%, and corn, 46%. He also pointed out that commercial farms, which make up about 17% of the farms that get assistance, received more than half of the total payments.

If the Doha Round proposal to reduce trade-distorting support and tariffs by 53% was adopted, the distribution of funds and subsidies would be shaken up to say the least, but Johanns believes that positive results for domestic growers and international markets could outweigh the loss in funds.

Impact on Global Markets

Developing countries across the globe watch as the U.S considers re-evaluating its agriculture-assistance programs, hoping to receive a substantial economic windfall from fewer trade restrictions. Under the current Doha negotiations, Johanns said there was consensus on several trade measures that would impact both the U.S. and global markets; however, without a final agreement, they would never come to fruition.

“Before the talks broke up, for example, it was agreed upon that all export subsidies would be eliminated by 2013. This was a significant step, but one that won’t be taking place without a final agreement,” Johanns said. “It was agreed that 39 least-developed countries would be provided significant duty-free, quota-free access to markets around the world. It was also agreed that substantial improvements in market access, tariff reductions in particular, would boost economic activity around the world. Better trade opportunities foster prosperity.”

According to Johanns, those least-developed countries could receive an economic boost on such a grandiose scale that the impact would be staggering. Two-thirds of the WTO members are considered developing countries, and 32 members are designated the least-developed. In those countries, more than 70% of the indigent live in rural areas with agriculture as the primary employer. Fewer trade restrictions in those countries could mean great stimulus in their economies.

“Developing countries are potentially large beneficiaries of an ambitious outcome from Doha. According to a World Bank study, roughly half of the global economic benefits from free trade would be enjoyed by those developing countries,” Johanns said. “Globally, 93% of the gains from agricultural policies would come from reducing trade-distorting import tariffs. A study by the International Institute of Economics estimates that global free trade could lift as many as 500 million people out of poverty and inject $200 billion annually into the economies of developing countries.”

Facing WTO challenges

While significant changes to the Farm Bill could open up international markets by stimulating trade and increasing prosperity domestically and abroad, Johanns said U.S. growers have another reason to support fewer trade-distorting subsidies and tariffs – the U.S. would face less vulnerability to WTO challenges. Brazil’s pledge to challenge the U.S. marketing loan program and counter-cyclical payment programs jeopardizes essential components of the U.S. farm program. But other countries are joining the fray, challenging subsidies and tariffs that they believe cause “serious prejudice” – or economic harm – to their trade efforts.

“We lost the Step 2 Cotton Case in the WTO, despite aggressively defending it. Uruguay has expressed concern about our rice program, and the C4 countries in Africa continue to raise concerns about the cotton program,” Johanns said.

Johanns said the U.S. had two options in addressing that concern. First, the U.S. could continue to institute programs that are dismantled piecemeal by WTO challenges. The second option, Johanns said, is to “grab hold of these issues and craft farm policy in such a way that it leads us to the future with vision and foresight. It comes down to a choice between being the authors of future farm policy, or being in the audience as WTO challenges pull the safety net out from underneath our producers.”

Federal Agriculture Investment is a Good Thing

For Johanns, the answer is clear-cut that U.S. farm policy needs to “be equitable, it needs to be predictable, and it needs to be beyond challenge … But how we do it is enormously important. It should be done in a way that is pro-trade, pro-growth, and fiscally responsible.”

Even as Johanns argues for a Farm Bill that eliminates much of the trade-distorting support, he defends the position that federal support of U.S. agriculture is a positive program. For him, the deal-maker is how that program is administered.

“I have always argued, I will do so forever, that federal investment in agriculture is wise, it’s worthwhile policy. But how we do it is enormously important,” he said. “I believe we owe it to our farmers and ranchers to do more than just rubber-stamp policies of the past. We owe it to them to thoughtfully consider how U.S. farm policy can help to set the future course of America’s first industry.”

Leave a Reply

Market Analysis Stories
Market Analysis

Cleveland: Bullish Reports, Bearish Responses

February 7, 2016

Absence of demand for cotton, among other factors, is sending mixed signals to the market.

Market Analysis

Shurley on Cotton: Prices Still Low, but Find Stability

January 25, 2016

After recently threatening the 60-61 cent range, prices now seem to have found a little support and – dare we say – upward momentum.

Market Analysis

Cleveland: Market Yawns as It Closely Watches China

January 18, 2016

Despite a 2.0 million bale reduction in world production and consumption, the market yawned and moved lower, all while watching for signs of a potential dump of low grade stocks by China.

Market Analysis

Shurley on Cotton: Looking Back at 2015 and Ahead to 2016

January 13, 2016

The New Year has not started off well for cotton. It is concerning, but this recent decline is likely short-term.

OA Cleveland
Market Analysis

Cleveland: Stagnant Prices and Demand Are Frustrating

January 8, 2016

The cotton market continues to take it on the chin, as prices go nowhere and demand for cotton remains low.

don shurley
Market Analysis

Shurley on Cotton: Ending the Year with a Positive Outlook

December 22, 2015

In spite of the challenges in 2015, it’s good to remember that the marketing year is less than half over. There may yet be better opportunities down the road.

OA Cleveland
Market Analysis

Cleveland: Low Demand Maintains Status Quo

December 21, 2015

Despite what should be positive indicators for cotton, the lingering loss of market share has simply stripped demand from the market for now.

Around The Gin
Product News

New FieldView Drive Provides Real Time Field Data Transfer

January 26, 2016

The Climate Corporation is launching FieldView Drive, a device that provides seamless transfer of real time field data and mapping from planting or harvesting equipment to a mobile device.

Product News

PhytoGen Releasing First Enlist Cotton Variety for 2016

January 13, 2016

PhytoGen is releasing PHY 490 W3FE, the first cottonseed variety with the Enlist cotton trait, for the 2016 growing season.

Product News

Enlist Cotton Ready to Launch for 2016

January 6, 2016

Dow AgroSciences announced that cotton growers will have access to the Enlist cotton technology in 2016.

Product News

Bayer Announces New 2016 FiberMax and Stoneville Cotton Varieties

January 5, 2016

Bayer has announced the release of three new FiberMax and Stoneville varieties for 2016, all featuring the company’s GlyTol, LibertyLink and TwinLink technologies.

Product News

Deltapine Announces Class of 16 Varieties

December 14, 2015

Four new Bollgard II XtendFlex cotton varieties make up the recently announced Deltapine Class of 16.

Product News

PhytoGen Varieties Raise Standards for Yield and Quality

November 30, 2015

Growers propelled two PhytoGen brand varieties toward the top of the 2015 USDA Cotton Varieties Planted report.

Product News

2016 Seed Showcase – All-Tex and Dyna-Gro

November 16, 2015

Sister cottonseed companies are working to extend their footprint in 2016.

Product News

2016 Seed Showcase – CROPLAN

November 16, 2015

Up-and-coming CROPLAN relies on careful variety evaluation and placement strategies for growth.

Latest News
Market Analysis

Cleveland: Bullish Reports, Bearish Responses

February 7, 2016

Absence of demand for cotton, among other factors, is sending mixed signals to the market.

Market Analysis

Cleveland: Feeling Bearish and Blue

February 1, 2016

Loss of cotton demand and a looming move of Chinese stocks has even O.A. Cleveland saying, “This hurts.”

Market Analysis

Shurley on Cotton: Prices Still Low, but Find Stability

January 25, 2016

After recently threatening the 60-61 cent range, prices now seem to have found a little support and – dare we say – upward momentum.

Market Analysis

Cleveland: “Stuck in the Mud” Market Remains Tiresome

January 22, 2016

This market is stuck in the mud – looking more like just holding a bottom rather than turning around.

Market Analysis

Cleveland: Market Yawns as It Closely Watches China

January 18, 2016

Despite a 2.0 million bale reduction in world production and consumption, the market yawned and moved lower, all while watching for signs of a potential dump of low grade stocks by China.

Market Analysis

Shurley on Cotton: Looking Back at 2015 and Ahead to 2016

January 13, 2016

The New Year has not started off well for cotton. It is concerning, but this recent decline is likely short-term.

Market Analysis

Cleveland: Stagnant Prices and Demand Are Frustrating

January 8, 2016

The cotton market continues to take it on the chin, as prices go nowhere and demand for cotton remains low.

Market Analysis

Shurley on Cotton: Ending the Year with a Positive Outlook

December 22, 2015

In spite of the challenges in 2015, it’s good to remember that the marketing year is less than half over. There may yet be better opportunities down the road.

Market Analysis

Cleveland: Low Demand Maintains Status Quo

December 21, 2015

Despite what should be positive indicators for cotton, the lingering loss of market share has simply stripped demand from the market for now.

Market Analysis

Shurley on Cotton: Hitting a Wall at 65 Cents

December 14, 2015

The disappointing decline is likely due to some of the bullish energy running out after the nice uptick we’ve experienced recently, plus a not so encouraging export report and the December USDA production and supply/demand numbers.

Market Analysis

Cleveland: Market Rises, Then Slips, Following USDA Report

December 14, 2015

The market slipped a bit last week. But it’s set to crawl higher – backing and filling along the way, but with a positive upward bias.

Market Analysis

Market Showing Bullish Indicators

December 4, 2015

The cotton market is demonstrating signs of life again. The U.S crop will be lower, and improved U.S. exports will hone sharp points on the old bull’s horns.

Market Analysis

Shurley on Cotton: Prices Finding More Support and Momentum

November 30, 2015

Prices are finding increasing support around the 62-cent level. That may not be exciting, but firming up the floor in a very volatile and uncertain market is a good thing.

Market Analysis

Shurley on Cotton: Prices Need Something to Grab Hold Of

November 16, 2015

Cotton prices desperately need something to grab hold of to help build momentum.

Market Analysis

World Production and Carryover Drops, But No Change in Prices

November 13, 2015

The absence of almost anything resembling demand continues to keep cotton prices locked in a near 10-cent trading range.