facebook_pixel

Johanns Believes U.S. Farmers Need A Global Perspective

As United States policy makers consider a new Farm Bill next year, the challenge of meeting domestic needs while balancing global concerns will be at the forefront of discussions. Financial sustainability of U.S. cotton growers needs to be addressed, along with the international demand for greater market access and growth of developing cotton-producing countries. According to U.S Agriculture Secretary Mike Johanns, those goals are not mutually exclusive; in fact, they may require looking at the future of cotton markets from the same perspective.

“Without open markets, the future is clouded for an industry that is so dependent on trade,” Johanns said at the Cato Institute’s Center for Trade Policy Studies in Washington, D.C.

Outlining a proposal on U.S. agriculture policy, Johanns said markets would benefit from reducing so-called trade-distorting support and tariffs by opening trade and increasing economic activity. He said the proposed plan in the Doha Round calls for a 53% reduction in all trade-distorting domestic support, which would mean significant changes to the 2002 Farm Bill. That would decrease the current allowed base spending level from $47.9 billion to $22 billion, but Johanns said he didn’t want domestic growers to get the wrong idea. Even with those changes, he emphasized that he supports the U.S. government’s investment in agriculture, but believes that assistance can be re-structured to better serve the global community.

“Our current Farm Bill programs cannot achieve their objectives with these substantial reductions, so these programs would have to be reformed if we reach an agreement that reduces trade-distorting support by 53%. This would cause us to rethink how we support agriculture,” Johanns said. “Viewed another way, we would have the opportunity to shift our resources to green box for example, such as conservation. There is no current ceiling on the green box today.”

A Difference of Opinion

Johanns has traveled the country, talking to farmers at Farm Bill listening sessions to learn what they like and dislike about the current policy. The comments vary across the spectrum from farmers who want substantial changes to those who would like to see the 2002 bill rubber-stamped for another five years. From cotton growers in Lubbock, TX, the answer was almost unanimous. “They want the Farm Bill reauthorized,” Johanns said. Other farmers have concerns about “trade-proofing the program” or “equitable distribution of federal funds to the areas that do not grow program crops.”

Some policies, such as conservation and Rural Development programs, receive few criticisms, while the subsidy programs are a point of contention. To understand the different perspectives, Johanns said it was important to analyze the current bill and examine its effects on U.S. agriculture and trade. Breaking the 2002 Farm Bill down to what he called “just the facts,” Johanns explained why some growers seek what they call a more equitable distribution of government subsidies.

“In the U.S., five crops account for 21% of our cash receipts in agriculture. Those five crops receive 93% of our subsidy payments,” he said. “Meanwhile our specialty crop farms which are now equal in value to the program crops – let me repeat that our specialty crops are equal in value to our program crops – receive virtually nothing from the subsidy program … So we have one group that gets the lion’s share of subsidies and another group equal in production value that receives virtually nothing.”

In addition to the disparities between program and specialty crops, Johanns also explained that subsidies were not allocated equally to the five program crops. He said on average, using numbers from 2002-2005, program crop subsidies were distributed as follows: soybeans received about 6%; rice, 8%; wheat, 10%; cotton, 23%, and corn, 46%. He also pointed out that commercial farms, which make up about 17% of the farms that get assistance, received more than half of the total payments.

If the Doha Round proposal to reduce trade-distorting support and tariffs by 53% was adopted, the distribution of funds and subsidies would be shaken up to say the least, but Johanns believes that positive results for domestic growers and international markets could outweigh the loss in funds.

Impact on Global Markets

Developing countries across the globe watch as the U.S considers re-evaluating its agriculture-assistance programs, hoping to receive a substantial economic windfall from fewer trade restrictions. Under the current Doha negotiations, Johanns said there was consensus on several trade measures that would impact both the U.S. and global markets; however, without a final agreement, they would never come to fruition.

“Before the talks broke up, for example, it was agreed upon that all export subsidies would be eliminated by 2013. This was a significant step, but one that won’t be taking place without a final agreement,” Johanns said. “It was agreed that 39 least-developed countries would be provided significant duty-free, quota-free access to markets around the world. It was also agreed that substantial improvements in market access, tariff reductions in particular, would boost economic activity around the world. Better trade opportunities foster prosperity.”

According to Johanns, those least-developed countries could receive an economic boost on such a grandiose scale that the impact would be staggering. Two-thirds of the WTO members are considered developing countries, and 32 members are designated the least-developed. In those countries, more than 70% of the indigent live in rural areas with agriculture as the primary employer. Fewer trade restrictions in those countries could mean great stimulus in their economies.

“Developing countries are potentially large beneficiaries of an ambitious outcome from Doha. According to a World Bank study, roughly half of the global economic benefits from free trade would be enjoyed by those developing countries,” Johanns said. “Globally, 93% of the gains from agricultural policies would come from reducing trade-distorting import tariffs. A study by the International Institute of Economics estimates that global free trade could lift as many as 500 million people out of poverty and inject $200 billion annually into the economies of developing countries.”

Facing WTO challenges

While significant changes to the Farm Bill could open up international markets by stimulating trade and increasing prosperity domestically and abroad, Johanns said U.S. growers have another reason to support fewer trade-distorting subsidies and tariffs – the U.S. would face less vulnerability to WTO challenges. Brazil’s pledge to challenge the U.S. marketing loan program and counter-cyclical payment programs jeopardizes essential components of the U.S. farm program. But other countries are joining the fray, challenging subsidies and tariffs that they believe cause “serious prejudice” – or economic harm – to their trade efforts.

“We lost the Step 2 Cotton Case in the WTO, despite aggressively defending it. Uruguay has expressed concern about our rice program, and the C4 countries in Africa continue to raise concerns about the cotton program,” Johanns said.

Johanns said the U.S. had two options in addressing that concern. First, the U.S. could continue to institute programs that are dismantled piecemeal by WTO challenges. The second option, Johanns said, is to “grab hold of these issues and craft farm policy in such a way that it leads us to the future with vision and foresight. It comes down to a choice between being the authors of future farm policy, or being in the audience as WTO challenges pull the safety net out from underneath our producers.”

Federal Agriculture Investment is a Good Thing

For Johanns, the answer is clear-cut that U.S. farm policy needs to “be equitable, it needs to be predictable, and it needs to be beyond challenge … But how we do it is enormously important. It should be done in a way that is pro-trade, pro-growth, and fiscally responsible.”

Even as Johanns argues for a Farm Bill that eliminates much of the trade-distorting support, he defends the position that federal support of U.S. agriculture is a positive program. For him, the deal-maker is how that program is administered.

“I have always argued, I will do so forever, that federal investment in agriculture is wise, it’s worthwhile policy. But how we do it is enormously important,” he said. “I believe we owe it to our farmers and ranchers to do more than just rubber-stamp policies of the past. We owe it to them to thoughtfully consider how U.S. farm policy can help to set the future course of America’s first industry.”

Leave a Reply

Market Analysis Stories
Market Analysis

Lower Chinese Stocks, Higher Polyester Prices Offer Market Hope

September 22, 2017

The market is holding steady, thanks again to China. Their Reserve auction has reduced cotton stocks and bumped consumption. And now, polyester prices are rising as the Chinese trim production.

Market Analysis

USDA Spins Market with Record Supply-to-Use Ratio

September 15, 2017

Hurricanes were but a mere hiccup for the world and U.S. crops. Instead, USDA spun some record-setting numbers that left the market dizzy.

Market Analysis

Post Harvey, 75 Cents Back in Cotton’s Sights

September 2, 2017

It remains to be seen if the greater loss from Harvey will be to cotton quantity or quality. But it likely means a wider trading range, with 75 cents now possible.

Market Analysis

Shurley: Storms and Other Unknowns for September

September 1, 2017

September could be interesting. Loss evaluation from Harvey will still be underway, and all eyes are watching Irma. How will it all impact USDA’s September report…if at all?

Market Analysis

Hurricane Harvey Leaves Several Market Scenarios

September 1, 2017

Following Hurricane Harvey’s rampage through East and Coastal Texas, cotton growers face several possible outcomes based on the level of damage to their fields.

Market Analysis

Market Watching for Harvey’s Impact on U.S. Crop

August 25, 2017

Hurricane Harvey blew prices to triple digit gains on the week. Now, the market will assess crop damage to see if the storm blew up crop projections as well.

Market Analysis

Was USDA Right? U.S. Crop Looking Bigger.

August 18, 2017

The U.S. crop is signaling that it is getting bigger. With nothing more than a good fall, the crop could climb as much as a million bales more than USDA’s August surprise estimate.

Around The Gin
Product News

Americot Adds Three to Regional Sales Force

September 20, 2017

Americot, Inc. has added three new regional representatives to the company’s sales force.

Product News

Enlist One Herbicide Added to Enlist System

September 13, 2017

Dow AgroSciences adds a straight-goods 2,4-D choline herbicide for additional tank-mix flexibility in Enlist crops.

Product News

Elevore Herbicide Registered for Burndown Use

August 30, 2017

Dow AgroSciences’ Elevore herbicide has received federal registration for use in fall and spring burndown programs for cotton, soybeans and corn.

Product News

Stoneville Legacy Club Honors Charter Members

August 24, 2017

The new Stoneville Legacy Club honored 129 growers who recorded average yields of 1,794 lbs/A or higher on at least 20 acres with Stoneville cotton varieties.

Product News

Improved Bollworm Management Expected in 2018

August 23, 2017

Southeast Texas cotton farmers should have new tools available in 2018 to better manage bollworms and other potentially damaging pests.

Product News

Maximizer Club Honors Top FiberMax Dryland Growers

August 17, 2017

The FiberMax Maximizer Club honored 121 growers who yielded at least 1,000 lb/A on dryland acres with FiberMax varieties in 2016.

Product News

Monsanto, Valent Expand Roundup Ready PLUS Partnership

August 7, 2017

Monsanto and Valent U.S.A. are expanding their crop protection partnership for the 2018 Roundup Ready PLUS Crop Management Solutions platform.

Product News

New Broadleaf Burndown Option Coming from Dow AgroSciences

July 31, 2017

A new burndown option for tough broadleaf weeds has shown excellent promise in trials across the Mid-South and Midwest.

Latest News
Market Analysis

Lower Chinese Stocks, Higher Polyester Prices Offer Market Hope

September 22, 2017

The market is holding steady, thanks again to China. Their Reserve auction has reduced cotton stocks and bumped consumption. And now, polyester prices are rising as the Chinese trim production.

Market Analysis

USDA Spins Market with Record Supply-to-Use Ratio

September 15, 2017

Hurricanes were but a mere hiccup for the world and U.S. crops. Instead, USDA spun some record-setting numbers that left the market dizzy.

Market Analysis

Shurley: Cotton Makes a Hard Landing

September 15, 2017

Following USDA’s September numbers, December cotton seems to have landed back in the 69-cent, pre-Harvey area.

Market Analysis

Higher Prices Holding as Winds Keep Blowing

September 10, 2017

An ill wind is blowing amidst the chaotic cotton trading wrought by back to back hurricanes slamming into two of the country’s major cotton producing regions. But which way does the wind blow?

Market Analysis

Post Harvey, 75 Cents Back in Cotton’s Sights

September 2, 2017

It remains to be seen if the greater loss from Harvey will be to cotton quantity or quality. But it likely means a wider trading range, with 75 cents now possible.

Market Analysis

Shurley: Storms and Other Unknowns for September

September 1, 2017

September could be interesting. Loss evaluation from Harvey will still be underway, and all eyes are watching Irma. How will it all impact USDA’s September report…if at all?

Market Analysis

Hurricane Harvey Leaves Several Market Scenarios

September 1, 2017

Following Hurricane Harvey’s rampage through East and Coastal Texas, cotton growers face several possible outcomes based on the level of damage to their fields.

Market Analysis

Market Watching for Harvey’s Impact on U.S. Crop

August 25, 2017

Hurricane Harvey blew prices to triple digit gains on the week. Now, the market will assess crop damage to see if the storm blew up crop projections as well.

Market Analysis

Was USDA Right? U.S. Crop Looking Bigger.

August 18, 2017

The U.S. crop is signaling that it is getting bigger. With nothing more than a good fall, the crop could climb as much as a million bales more than USDA’s August surprise estimate.

Market Analysis

Shurley: So Much for 18 Million Bales and Higher Prices

August 14, 2017

If USDA’s September numbers still validate a 20+ million bale crop, prices could slide. If not, the 68-70 cent level – or better – should hold.

Market Analysis

USDA Report Stuns Market. Now, Wait for Reality.

August 14, 2017

USDA stunned the market with its August estimate of U.S. cotton production. But remember – history has shown consistent deviation between mid-summer estimates and final harvest realities.

Market Analysis

Production, Weather Woes Boosting Market

August 4, 2017

Mother Nature’s recent Texas outburst was rough on cotton fields. But it was enough to boost prices back into the 70s.

Market Analysis

Technically Speaking, Pay Attention to Fundamentals

July 28, 2017

With prices holding in a three-cent range, it’s likely time to pay attention to what the market fundamentals and technicals are telling us.

Market Analysis

December Futures Prices? Ask Mother Nature.

July 23, 2017

Opinions differ on where December futures prices may go. But there’s no doubt that Mother Nature holds the key to forthcoming price activity.

Market Analysis

With Market Oversold, Is Bullish Return Near?

July 14, 2017

The cotton invert continues, as both the U.S. and Australian crops are oversold.