Fraud Suspected in Financial Havoc in Texas Cotton Pools

Tracey Griffith, a cotton grower in Whiteface, TX, isn’t quite sure who or what to attribute his losses to this year in the cotton market. But by his estimates, due to under-deliveries, his participation in the West Texas Pool comprised of Beltwide Cotton Cooperative Members cost him somewhere in the range of $300,000.

“There are a lot of disappointed farmers. We’re going to end up taking about .68 cents a pound on our cotton. I would’ve been happy with .80 cents or .78 cents,” says Griffith.

Advertisement

“Fraud looks to be the biggest part of it.”

While nothing has been proven, sources indicate that some farmers may have reneged on their previously signed contracts, choosing instead to gin their cotton elsewhere and cash in on record-high new crop cotton prices.

A letter signed by Allenberg Cotton Company’s Chuck Hilboldt indicates that the company suspects foul play among some of the West Texas Pool participants.

Top Articles
Think Twice Before Cutting Pre-Applied Herbicides

“In this particular case it is not reasonable to attribute Beltwide under-deliveries strictly to lower yields. In its recent production release, USDA reported ginnings in districts 1S and 2S (the primary regions supplying cotton to Beltwide) are above the previous month’s production figure. We believe there is, but cannot yet prove, incidence of producers in your coop who have engaged in deliberate under-delivery,” said Hilboldt in a letter addressed to Beltwide Cotton Cooperative Members dated February 14.

Regardless of the reasoning, Griffith says the under-delivery will affect many growers in the Southwest this year.

“We’re going to lose about $300,000. Everybody who’s in our gin, which is probably 30 customers, will be affected. That’s just our gin. No telling how many farmers in all will be affected by this,” says Griffith.

Griffith says he isn’t ruling out simple mismanagement on the part of the merchants who handle the pools he belongs to. He says he plans to attend meetings in late February and early March with representatives from ECOM and his cooperative to help bring the situation to light.

For their part, cotton merchants have been steadfast in pursuing any claims of farmers who have engaged in deliberate under-delivery.

“Allenberg Cotton Co. fully understands the gravity of this year’s situation. The pool results for 2010 are not in keeping with past results, and for that we apologize,” said Hilboldt in his letter.

Growers like Griffith, who will bear the brunt of the financial burden, have little sympathy for anyone – merchant or farmer – at the root of this problem.

“If there are guys out there who took their cotton somewhere else when they had already signed a contract, I hope they prosecute every one of them,” says Griffith. “They cost me and my family money. I honored my end of it. To me, its thievery if you took your cotton and sold it somewhere else,” says Griffith.
 

0

Leave a Reply

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

One of excuses the pool representatives are stating is that the USDA over estimated the 2010 crop, however, anybody who stepped out of the pickup past fall knew that the USDA numbers were over-inflated. When the numbers were questioned, the response was that West Texas has a record low of failed acres. Once again, if folks would have taken time to look at the crop could tell that the yield potential on those acres was average at best to very poor, especially on dryland.

More power to these cotton companies in pursueing growers that moved their cotton, but it also appears that these guys got caught in the trap of believing that West Texas had a record crop and over-marketed. Greed on farmers who did not deliver contracted cotton plus greed on the cotton companies that over-marketed….the combination of these two spells disaster

Now matter how you look at it, the grower that did the “right thing” is the one that suffers.

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

I believe any producer who intentionally did this is no better than a common thief. They can and should be prosecuted by the District Attorney, or perhaps since it involves interstate commerce it should be the Justice Department and US Attorney. Records could be obtained by the court from landlords and the USDA to assist in proving a case.

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

I think it’s time that we take a close look at the cotton buyers …. all the other cotton contracts ( in our area) paid up to 16 cents more than ECOM … lucky us… our contract was with ECOM….I feel they got greedy… and they lined their pockets with money that should have gone into the local farmers pocket. The producers that broke their contracts are going to lose and the farmers(like us) that honored our contracts lost also…. so I call that a LOSS – Loss for the farmer… and the cotton buyers are still out their buying cotton….

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

Historic prices were lost by farmers whether it was from fraud or the pool I personally believe the pools didn’t perform ther fiduciary duty to achieve an average price for our cotton and didn’t do it for free either.If there is as much fraud as they say there is then they should pay and dearly. To the community not directly related to agriculture it would seem as though the farmer got Rich when in fact we were robed by cheating farmers or the pool .it is a subject that will disputed for a long time to come it will forever echo through out the cotton community.

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

Merchants operating the pools, buy cotton from the pools themselves, causing me to wonder if the cotton profits are passed on to the producer, or realized on the final sale.

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

It does not take the ole cliche “you let the fox into the hen house” to figure this math problem out. Once again the “honest” farmer comes up on the short side. Self-regulating within the pool system and no reporting at the coop generally lends to sharp profit taking at the broker level with very little left for the grower, who has all the risk. So who’s watching the door?
From seed prices,chemical prices, fuel prices, fertilizer prices and now possible complete Federal policy changes, growers do not need dishonesty in marketing to boot. So why can we not all get along? “follow the money”

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

FYI, for those of you who are members of marketing pools, you may have the pool records audited (at your own expense)if you believe they have cheated you. I don’t believe the pools did anything wrong, they sell cotton continually through out the year. It is like taking all of your cotton, then selling 1/12 of your production each month, at the monthly average price. If you go back and look at the prices traded from say January 2010 thru October 2010, you will see the market would not have brought you $1.5/lb, but more along the line of 75 to 80 cents. If you know of a fellow farmer who did cheat the system, turn him/her in. They deserve any and all punishments they can get. This would be no different then if they had come into your home and stole your belongings. They stole from you pure and simple!

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

I am not asking for for 1.50…. farms are not uneducated nor stupid… and we do know when someone has taken advantage of us..if the other pools can pay a fair price then … ECOM is taking advantage of the farmers that honored their contracts. Ecom should be ashamed! You can’t bite the hand that feeds you… ECOM will reap what they sow.

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

Producers in this day and age should be advocating for themselves and quit putting all their eggs in one basket…i.e. the pools period. Pools are great for some but not for most. When a producer has down time they really need to educate themselves in ALL of the aspects of marketing and then choose wisely. The pools are NOT always the answer.

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

One of excuses the pool representatives are stating is that the USDA over estimated the 2010 crop, however, anybody who stepped out of the pickup past fall knew that the USDA numbers were over-inflated. When the numbers were questioned, the response was that West Texas has a record low of failed acres. Once again, if folks would have taken time to look at the crop could tell that the yield potential on those acres was average at best to very poor, especially on dryland.

More power to these cotton companies in pursueing growers that moved their cotton, but it also appears that these guys got caught in the trap of believing that West Texas had a record crop and over-marketed. Greed on farmers who did not deliver contracted cotton plus greed on the cotton companies that over-marketed….the combination of these two spells disaster

Now matter how you look at it, the grower that did the “right thing” is the one that suffers.

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

I believe any producer who intentionally did this is no better than a common thief. They can and should be prosecuted by the District Attorney, or perhaps since it involves interstate commerce it should be the Justice Department and US Attorney. Records could be obtained by the court from landlords and the USDA to assist in proving a case.

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

I think it’s time that we take a close look at the cotton buyers …. all the other cotton contracts ( in our area) paid up to 16 cents more than ECOM … lucky us… our contract was with ECOM….I feel they got greedy… and they lined their pockets with money that should have gone into the local farmers pocket. The producers that broke their contracts are going to lose and the farmers(like us) that honored our contracts lost also…. so I call that a LOSS – Loss for the farmer… and the cotton buyers are still out their buying cotton….

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

Historic prices were lost by farmers whether it was from fraud or the pool I personally believe the pools didn’t perform ther fiduciary duty to achieve an average price for our cotton and didn’t do it for free either.If there is as much fraud as they say there is then they should pay and dearly. To the community not directly related to agriculture it would seem as though the farmer got Rich when in fact we were robed by cheating farmers or the pool .it is a subject that will disputed for a long time to come it will forever echo through out the cotton community.

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

Merchants operating the pools, buy cotton from the pools themselves, causing me to wonder if the cotton profits are passed on to the producer, or realized on the final sale.

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

It does not take the ole cliche “you let the fox into the hen house” to figure this math problem out. Once again the “honest” farmer comes up on the short side. Self-regulating within the pool system and no reporting at the coop generally lends to sharp profit taking at the broker level with very little left for the grower, who has all the risk. So who’s watching the door?
From seed prices,chemical prices, fuel prices, fertilizer prices and now possible complete Federal policy changes, growers do not need dishonesty in marketing to boot. So why can we not all get along? “follow the money”

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

FYI, for those of you who are members of marketing pools, you may have the pool records audited (at your own expense)if you believe they have cheated you. I don’t believe the pools did anything wrong, they sell cotton continually through out the year. It is like taking all of your cotton, then selling 1/12 of your production each month, at the monthly average price. If you go back and look at the prices traded from say January 2010 thru October 2010, you will see the market would not have brought you $1.5/lb, but more along the line of 75 to 80 cents. If you know of a fellow farmer who did cheat the system, turn him/her in. They deserve any and all punishments they can get. This would be no different then if they had come into your home and stole your belongings. They stole from you pure and simple!

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

I am not asking for for 1.50…. farms are not uneducated nor stupid… and we do know when someone has taken advantage of us..if the other pools can pay a fair price then … ECOM is taking advantage of the farmers that honored their contracts. Ecom should be ashamed! You can’t bite the hand that feeds you… ECOM will reap what they sow.

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

Producers in this day and age should be advocating for themselves and quit putting all their eggs in one basket…i.e. the pools period. Pools are great for some but not for most. When a producer has down time they really need to educate themselves in ALL of the aspects of marketing and then choose wisely. The pools are NOT always the answer.