Monsanto Outlines Changes to Roundup Herbicide Business

Monsanto Company recently outlined changes to its Roundup brand agricultural herbicide business which are expected to result in more competitive offerings for U.S. farmers. Business changes include adjusting the price of its Roundup brand agricultural herbicides; investing in U.S. manufacturing capacity to help provide a long-term, reliable supply; and continuing to invest in product quality and new innovations while helping farmers manage risk.

The company announced it is slashing price on its Roundup brand agricultural herbicides. “We anticipate farmers will see Roundup prices that are 50 percent of what they were last year,” said Glenn Stith, North American crop protection lead. “This new price is effective now as retailers and farmers begin planning for the 2010 planting season.”

Global Competition

“The global glyphosate business was incredibly volatile in 2008 and 2009 resulting in a difficult situation for both suppliers and farmers to manage through,” Stith says. “Retailers and farmers faced uncertain product supply, rapidly fluctuating prices, and some quality issues from Chinese suppliers that led to crop safety concerns and failures in weed control.”

There are two primary sources of glyphosate – Monsanto and approximately 50 China-based companies, many of which are government-owned or controlled operations that frequently shift production based on changes in policy and need for the key raw materials. This can have a significant impact on supply to US farmers.

Top Articles
Shurley: USDA Acres Report Boosts US Crop, But Not By Much

Stith explains, “Monsanto is investing to help U.S. farmers have a reliable supply of Roundup brand agricultural herbicides that is competitively priced and superior to generic imports. It is critical for U.S. farmers to have a trusted and reliable source in a highly competitive market that has seen dramatic fluctuations. We believe we can offer farmers a competitively priced product that is superior to the Chinese generics in the market.”

Investing to Provide Reliable Supply

In the past two years, Monsanto invested $200 million in additional capacity in the Luling, La., plant that supplies formulated Roundup agricultural herbicide brands. The added supply from Luling will come online in the months to come. The company has also made investments to increase mining capacity for glyphosate raw materials in southeastern Idaho. Proposed plans for the mine are currently under regulatory review.

The company is also actively investing in weed control research that will benefit farmers. These include biotechnology traits like dicamba- and glufosinate-tolerance as well as chemistry solutions such as new formulations of dicamba and acetochlor.

“We realize that each season farmers make choices when it comes to the specific herbicides, seeds and traits that they purchase,” said Stith. “Our investments in capacity show our commitment to providing farmers and retailers with a consistent supply of high-quality product with unsurpassed weed control when they make that decision.”
 

0

Leave a Reply

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

The Devil is in the details. I will not buy anything that I can keep from if ya’ll try to tie my hands with a program. Every year in past the DEVIL has been in the details.

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

YEA, THATS ALL WELL AND GOOD, BUT HOW MUCH WILL MONSANTO UP THE COST OF THE TECHNOLOGY FEE?? 20 TO 30 PERCENT PER BAG?? I’D BET ON IT!

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

Kim Seago has it right. Monsanto will do what is necessary to end up with an increase in revenue and 99% of any profit associated with the change.

You could see tech fees double!!!!!

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

What a load of crap! China kicked their butt on glyfos this season otherwise you would have never heard a word about dropping the price. Let’s face it. Monsanto has us bent over a barrel and they know it. Ridiculous tech fees etc., because it’s only about them making more money, which is fine but don’t tell us that you are doing this all because of the farmer. Monsanto is NOT the farmers friend.

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

Last year they kicked ou teeth out!!! They had an increase in market share because China was out of the market, doubled the price on us. Thanks to the U.S. Justice Dept giving them free reins to shaft us to death. They are killing our bottom line with their greed. We need a class action lawsuit!!!!

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

Why buy roundup when it doesn’t touch the resistant weeds. Buying RR/RF tech are just an added expense. Break out your old cultivators. Our
trouble is finding conventional seed.

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

I am going back to planting generic cotton if I can get the seed. There is just no money in it for me at the present cost of inputs.
I am set up to grow cotton and I want to grow cotton, but the government has let seven million bales of use go over seas with NAFTA. The dollar is so low that inputs of fertilizer from over seas cost so much and, seed at over five hundred dollars per bag. that just does not make it to the bottom line.
It is not worth it to me I never had to spray my cotton more than two times in a bad year. My problem was fall army worms and aphids.

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

An insider who knows how badly Monsanto put it to us last year says: “You should ask them how many of those Chinese suppliers they have bought from, bought out and bought off in the past.” ???????

So I just did! And he knows tha answer to that question, and it’s not good. It was an artificially induced shortage last year by Monsanto, just because they COULD!

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

They announce this AFTER they lost 400 million in Roundup sales in 2009. They thought they had the market in their pocket but the growers and herbicide competitors proved them wrong. This is NOT about the farmer, its about Monsanto stockholders. You can bet the farm that tech fees WILL increase for 2010. They want us to pick up the tab for their greed and ultimate loss in 2009.

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

We’ve ALREADY been told the tech fee is going up AGAIN for 2010. They are only slashing prices on Roundup because they jacked them up so much last year. Nobody wanted their Roundup product anymore so they lost market share. Is it going to take farmers to stop planting cotton before they get the message?

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

The cotton traits are good,but how much longer are we gonna have to pay for the technology? I mean the technology is there,and has been for years,but how much longer do we have to pay for it? If you keep charging these fees,your gonna price us right out of busness. The bottom line is,tech fees and the cost of round-up keep going up, but the price of cotton stays the same per pound.You can only push a crop so much,and with these prices the bottom line is still in the red.What are you greedy son of a guns gonna do when no farmer can afford your products anymore? The gins around here are already looking at alternatives to help us out in these trying times. I have already cut my seeding rates back to scary lows just to be able to plant cotton,but I am looking at other alternatives myself, like pulling the old cultivators out With he cost of fuel down some now maybe a fewer trips across the field would be less than the cost of sprayng round-up over the top. By the way your round-up won’t kill anything but grass anymore. My question is, did you water it down, or is it a product from China?

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

sssssssssssssss

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

The Devil is in the details. I will not buy anything that I can keep from if ya’ll try to tie my hands with a program. Every year in past the DEVIL has been in the details.

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

YEA, THATS ALL WELL AND GOOD, BUT HOW MUCH WILL MONSANTO UP THE COST OF THE TECHNOLOGY FEE?? 20 TO 30 PERCENT PER BAG?? I’D BET ON IT!

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

Kim Seago has it right. Monsanto will do what is necessary to end up with an increase in revenue and 99% of any profit associated with the change.

You could see tech fees double!!!!!

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

What a load of crap! China kicked their butt on glyfos this season otherwise you would have never heard a word about dropping the price. Let’s face it. Monsanto has us bent over a barrel and they know it. Ridiculous tech fees etc., because it’s only about them making more money, which is fine but don’t tell us that you are doing this all because of the farmer. Monsanto is NOT the farmers friend.

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

Last year they kicked ou teeth out!!! They had an increase in market share because China was out of the market, doubled the price on us. Thanks to the U.S. Justice Dept giving them free reins to shaft us to death. They are killing our bottom line with their greed. We need a class action lawsuit!!!!

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

Why buy roundup when it doesn’t touch the resistant weeds. Buying RR/RF tech are just an added expense. Break out your old cultivators. Our
trouble is finding conventional seed.

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

I am going back to planting generic cotton if I can get the seed. There is just no money in it for me at the present cost of inputs.
I am set up to grow cotton and I want to grow cotton, but the government has let seven million bales of use go over seas with NAFTA. The dollar is so low that inputs of fertilizer from over seas cost so much and, seed at over five hundred dollars per bag. that just does not make it to the bottom line.
It is not worth it to me I never had to spray my cotton more than two times in a bad year. My problem was fall army worms and aphids.

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

An insider who knows how badly Monsanto put it to us last year says: “You should ask them how many of those Chinese suppliers they have bought from, bought out and bought off in the past.” ???????

So I just did! And he knows tha answer to that question, and it’s not good. It was an artificially induced shortage last year by Monsanto, just because they COULD!

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

They announce this AFTER they lost 400 million in Roundup sales in 2009. They thought they had the market in their pocket but the growers and herbicide competitors proved them wrong. This is NOT about the farmer, its about Monsanto stockholders. You can bet the farm that tech fees WILL increase for 2010. They want us to pick up the tab for their greed and ultimate loss in 2009.

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

We’ve ALREADY been told the tech fee is going up AGAIN for 2010. They are only slashing prices on Roundup because they jacked them up so much last year. Nobody wanted their Roundup product anymore so they lost market share. Is it going to take farmers to stop planting cotton before they get the message?

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

The cotton traits are good,but how much longer are we gonna have to pay for the technology? I mean the technology is there,and has been for years,but how much longer do we have to pay for it? If you keep charging these fees,your gonna price us right out of busness. The bottom line is,tech fees and the cost of round-up keep going up, but the price of cotton stays the same per pound.You can only push a crop so much,and with these prices the bottom line is still in the red.What are you greedy son of a guns gonna do when no farmer can afford your products anymore? The gins around here are already looking at alternatives to help us out in these trying times. I have already cut my seeding rates back to scary lows just to be able to plant cotton,but I am looking at other alternatives myself, like pulling the old cultivators out With he cost of fuel down some now maybe a fewer trips across the field would be less than the cost of sprayng round-up over the top. By the way your round-up won’t kill anything but grass anymore. My question is, did you water it down, or is it a product from China?

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

sssssssssssssss